<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t automatically blame Pritchard for no trades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade</link>
	<description>Just watching the world float by...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:43:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peregrinebrm</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12535</link>
		<dc:creator>peregrinebrm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12535</guid>
		<description>Re Young Players,

Without knocking any commenter or any young Blazers, I have a general irritation about a mindset that I&#039;m seeing expressed here again and again.  One person commented that it was worth killing a Gerald Wallace trade to keep Batum; others have talked about how wonderful Bayless is.  On the radio, Antonio (I believe it was him) said that of course they kept Bayless - how could the organization have given up on him already?

I think Harvey&#039;s comment most clearly misses the point.  You don&#039;t have to give up on a player to trade him.  Who is offered for Bayless?  If you turn that trade down, are you saying you&#039;ve given up on the player being offered?

Regarding not trading a guy like Bayless or Batum because of all of their potential, I say this: the investment made in these guys has been almost nil so far.  Yes they are nice prospects - but I could point to future draft picks, and they have potential as well.  It seems odd (but endearing) that we fans, playing GM, seem to think that all of our rookies are such stars-in-the-making that trading them should be unthinkable.

Gerald Wallace, for example, already IS a star.  He&#039;s what we HOPE Batum will become.

It&#039;s late and I&#039;m not making my point well or concisely so I&#039;ll end this.  Let&#039;s just say that if the Blazers had 3 first-rounders this summer, there would be a bunch of fans saying at mid-season that we absolutely cannot trade any of these promising star prospects.  I can predict this without knowing who they are. There are always more to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Young Players,</p>
<p>Without knocking any commenter or any young Blazers, I have a general irritation about a mindset that I&#8217;m seeing expressed here again and again.  One person commented that it was worth killing a Gerald Wallace trade to keep Batum; others have talked about how wonderful Bayless is.  On the radio, Antonio (I believe it was him) said that of course they kept Bayless &#8211; how could the organization have given up on him already?</p>
<p>I think Harvey&#8217;s comment most clearly misses the point.  You don&#8217;t have to give up on a player to trade him.  Who is offered for Bayless?  If you turn that trade down, are you saying you&#8217;ve given up on the player being offered?</p>
<p>Regarding not trading a guy like Bayless or Batum because of all of their potential, I say this: the investment made in these guys has been almost nil so far.  Yes they are nice prospects &#8211; but I could point to future draft picks, and they have potential as well.  It seems odd (but endearing) that we fans, playing GM, seem to think that all of our rookies are such stars-in-the-making that trading them should be unthinkable.</p>
<p>Gerald Wallace, for example, already IS a star.  He&#8217;s what we HOPE Batum will become.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s late and I&#8217;m not making my point well or concisely so I&#8217;ll end this.  Let&#8217;s just say that if the Blazers had 3 first-rounders this summer, there would be a bunch of fans saying at mid-season that we absolutely cannot trade any of these promising star prospects.  I can predict this without knowing who they are. There are always more to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacequiet</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12518</link>
		<dc:creator>peacequiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12518</guid>
		<description>Good grief BlazerMVP !
My goodness,he is just a rookie.

Take a look at the slack everybody(not me)everyone gives to
Outlaw and he has played 6 years !
For pete&#039;s sake let&#039;s not set these kids up for failure so
quickly.

I don&#039;t know of a soul who compares him to Chris Paul.
How about just letting him be Jerryd Bayless ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief BlazerMVP !<br />
My goodness,he is just a rookie.</p>
<p>Take a look at the slack everybody(not me)everyone gives to<br />
Outlaw and he has played 6 years !<br />
For pete&#8217;s sake let&#8217;s not set these kids up for failure so<br />
quickly.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of a soul who compares him to Chris Paul.<br />
How about just letting him be Jerryd Bayless ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12509</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12509</guid>
		<description>Dwight,
As an ex-journalist blogger, you have the access of a journalist, but I am not aware of what controls exist for the use of anonymous sources for this blog.  Something doesn&#039;t feel right about you relating something from the front office about the coaching staff without any kind of accountability.  A story about a power struggle between coaches and GM should be a well-sourced and balanced article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwight,<br />
As an ex-journalist blogger, you have the access of a journalist, but I am not aware of what controls exist for the use of anonymous sources for this blog.  Something doesn&#8217;t feel right about you relating something from the front office about the coaching staff without any kind of accountability.  A story about a power struggle between coaches and GM should be a well-sourced and balanced article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlazerMVP</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12506</link>
		<dc:creator>BlazerMVP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12506</guid>
		<description>I am not sold on Bayless. I typically refer to him as &quot;Jarrett Stoudamire&quot;.

What&#039;s so great about him?

1. Lackluster FG%.
2. Inability to properly distribute.
3. Shoot-first point guard.
4. Height issues against other guards.
5. Mediocre defense.
6. No mid-range or long-range game.
7. Only two &quot;coming out&quot; games in a matter of a 14 game stretch - where he got playing time.

Portland seems so infatuated with him. I agree his speed and athletic moves are nice..... but why are we all looking at him like he is the next Chris Paul? I think he is just a short step up from JJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sold on Bayless. I typically refer to him as &#8220;Jarrett Stoudamire&#8221;.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s so great about him?</p>
<p>1. Lackluster FG%.<br />
2. Inability to properly distribute.<br />
3. Shoot-first point guard.<br />
4. Height issues against other guards.<br />
5. Mediocre defense.<br />
6. No mid-range or long-range game.<br />
7. Only two &#8220;coming out&#8221; games in a matter of a 14 game stretch &#8211; where he got playing time.</p>
<p>Portland seems so infatuated with him. I agree his speed and athletic moves are nice&#8230;.. but why are we all looking at him like he is the next Chris Paul? I think he is just a short step up from JJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRAHAM</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12505</link>
		<dc:creator>GRAHAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12505</guid>
		<description>The fact is that none of the deals that we all heard about would have made them better than the Spurs, Lakers or maybe even the Jazz when they become healthy. I&#039;m sure it was very hard for the Blazers to not make a deal, but right now it looks like they made the right move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that none of the deals that we all heard about would have made them better than the Spurs, Lakers or maybe even the Jazz when they become healthy. I&#8217;m sure it was very hard for the Blazers to not make a deal, but right now it looks like they made the right move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacequiet</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12504</link>
		<dc:creator>peacequiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12504</guid>
		<description>And thank god they didn&#039;t trade Batum, another of my favorite
young players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And thank god they didn&#8217;t trade Batum, another of my favorite<br />
young players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacequiet</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12503</link>
		<dc:creator>peacequiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12503</guid>
		<description>I am very disappointed that the Blazer organization isn&#039;t going
full throttle on developing Bayless.

This young kid can take the floor and completely energize the entire team.He is lightening fast,and can flat out score when
asked to get to the basket.

He is an attractive young player,exciting dunker(understatement),
and I feel could be a very popular Blazer. There is just a buzz
when he takes the court.

Why are they not doing this ?

I am elated they didn&#039;t trade him. I would loved to have traded
Sergio for another player and let Bayless thrive and learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very disappointed that the Blazer organization isn&#8217;t going<br />
full throttle on developing Bayless.</p>
<p>This young kid can take the floor and completely energize the entire team.He is lightening fast,and can flat out score when<br />
asked to get to the basket.</p>
<p>He is an attractive young player,exciting dunker(understatement),<br />
and I feel could be a very popular Blazer. There is just a buzz<br />
when he takes the court.</p>
<p>Why are they not doing this ?</p>
<p>I am elated they didn&#8217;t trade him. I would loved to have traded<br />
Sergio for another player and let Bayless thrive and learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12502</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12502</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of gossip girls!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of gossip girls!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12501</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12501</guid>
		<description>I know but i&#039;m not telling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know but i&#8217;m not telling!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/there-was-almost-a-blazer-trade/comment-page-1#comment-12500</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=2094#comment-12500</guid>
		<description>tease, come on give me a break</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tease, come on give me a break</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
