Dallas carves up the Blazers
Well, this is what happens when a smart team goes after the Trail Blazers the right way. Portland’s pick-and-roll defense is no better than it was weeks ago and that’s allowing the opposition to get whatever matchups it wishes. But you’re tired of listening to me about this. . . so here’s Dave from Blazers Edge ranting about the same thing:
Most teams look for matchups to exploit, figuring that if your power forward can’t guard theirs they have an advantage. The Blazers have revolutionized that concept for the opponent. If you have a mismatch against any Portland player you can just run screens until you get them matched up against you. The Blazers’ point guard on your 7-foot power forward? No problem. A center against your point out on the perimeter? You got it! Call in the next 12 minutes (because you know we can’t do this all day) and we’ll throw in a case of ineffective double-teams, three or four instances of slow interior rotation on drivers, and a lifetime supply of not getting out to your shooters. Regular readers will know this is not a new phenomenon for the Blazers. But the Mavericks with their Dirk Nowitzkis and their Jason Kidds and Jason Terrys make it painfully obvious. How many times can you see Jerryd Bayless on Nowitzki before you throw your hands up in disgust?
Well said, Dave. I get a lot of comments from people who say, “You idiot, do you think you’re smarter than Nate McMillan?” No, I don’t. Not at all — at least in terms of basketball. But this is one area where I just don’t understand what his team is attempting to do on defense. Folks, this isn’t a player problem, it’s a system problem. They’re being coached to switch and then they never bother, even, to switch back.
I’ve watched the Blazers and Mavs play twice this season and I’m a firm believer that Portland has the better players. But the Mavericks have won twice because they’ve played better. Smarter.
Watch last night’s game and see the way Dallas, which doesn’t feature very good defenders, handles the pick and roll. Most of the game, the Blazers didn’t get much because the Mavs simply popped out on the screen, defended the ball, stayed with the man rolling off the screen . . . oh hell, you saw it. Of course, it makes a difference that the Blazers seemingly NEVER look for the man rolling away from the pick. Oden is rapidly losing interest in the whole process because it’s so futile for him.
Yes, I’m sick of writing about this. But get used to it. It doesn’t look to me as if rapid change is on the way. And allowing 55 percent shooting just isn’t going to get it done against real NBA teams.


