<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pragmatism rules!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules</link>
	<description>Just watching the world float by...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff S</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>Dwight -

I heard you mention this on Talkin&#039; Ball last night too - how Detroit was without Rip Hamilton and Rasheed Wallace.  I&#039;m sure I don&#039;t have to remind you they were on a seven game winning streak, most of which were without one or both of those guys anyway.

So while I agree with you on the pick-and-roll defense, the rebounding, the lack of offensive play-calling for Oden, etc., don&#039;t discount the Pistons because they were down a couple guys.  Detroit managed to do just fine the last several games without those guys.

And any time you still have a guys named Iverson, Prince, McDyess, Maxiell, Stuckey, etc., in your lineup, you&#039;re a team to be reckoned with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwight -</p>
<p>I heard you mention this on Talkin&#8217; Ball last night too &#8211; how Detroit was without Rip Hamilton and Rasheed Wallace.  I&#8217;m sure I don&#8217;t have to remind you they were on a seven game winning streak, most of which were without one or both of those guys anyway.</p>
<p>So while I agree with you on the pick-and-roll defense, the rebounding, the lack of offensive play-calling for Oden, etc., don&#8217;t discount the Pistons because they were down a couple guys.  Detroit managed to do just fine the last several games without those guys.</p>
<p>And any time you still have a guys named Iverson, Prince, McDyess, Maxiell, Stuckey, etc., in your lineup, you&#8217;re a team to be reckoned with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beam</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Eric,

Why did u address me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Why did u address me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric k</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-3008</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-3008</guid>
		<description>Jim,

They used Oden and Pryz together a little bit last week.  Probably a concern is foul trouble, we talk about GO&#039;s foul porblems, but lets not forget Joel picks up a fair amoutn too, getting 48 minutes out of the pair of them with one of them on the court most fo the time is porbably the goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>They used Oden and Pryz together a little bit last week.  Probably a concern is foul trouble, we talk about GO&#8217;s foul porblems, but lets not forget Joel picks up a fair amoutn too, getting 48 minutes out of the pair of them with one of them on the court most fo the time is porbably the goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-3002</guid>
		<description>Bayless showed why he deserves some more playing time. His defense on Iverson was quite good considering he is a rookie with little playing time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bayless showed why he deserves some more playing time. His defense on Iverson was quite good considering he is a rookie with little playing time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvydas</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvydas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-3001</guid>
		<description>Terrific insights Dwight.

I might add a few more:
-The Blazers start Batum because he supposedly is the team&#039;s best defensive player, so why not put him on Prince during that 4th quarter. 26 points for Prince is way too much.

-is there some rule in Nate&#039;s book that disallows the Blazers from running a big, and I mean huge lineup. Lamarcus, Batum or Outlaw, Rudy Oden, and Pryz. Most teams barely have one 7footer and we have 4 and 5 if you count Batum&#039;s arms. 

-likewise, why can&#039;t we run small at times, with 3 guards

-They need to trade Sergio, I&#039;m tired of seeing this kid get tossed in and out of the lineup, he&#039;s improved this year. It might be best for him. Just once I&#039;d like to see him get a whole 40 minutes, I&#039;d eve settle for an entire half. 

-Along those lines, there is nothing more annoying than those wannabe GM&#039;s, that sit behind me at the Rose Garden who analyze trades all game long, and rip on Sergio like they know so much about playing point guard. They talk trades during the entire game about everybody on the roster and then switch back to talking about shooting characters in their video games...these are grown men by the way. Not making this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific insights Dwight.</p>
<p>I might add a few more:<br />
-The Blazers start Batum because he supposedly is the team&#8217;s best defensive player, so why not put him on Prince during that 4th quarter. 26 points for Prince is way too much.</p>
<p>-is there some rule in Nate&#8217;s book that disallows the Blazers from running a big, and I mean huge lineup. Lamarcus, Batum or Outlaw, Rudy Oden, and Pryz. Most teams barely have one 7footer and we have 4 and 5 if you count Batum&#8217;s arms. </p>
<p>-likewise, why can&#8217;t we run small at times, with 3 guards</p>
<p>-They need to trade Sergio, I&#8217;m tired of seeing this kid get tossed in and out of the lineup, he&#8217;s improved this year. It might be best for him. Just once I&#8217;d like to see him get a whole 40 minutes, I&#8217;d eve settle for an entire half. </p>
<p>-Along those lines, there is nothing more annoying than those wannabe GM&#8217;s, that sit behind me at the Rose Garden who analyze trades all game long, and rip on Sergio like they know so much about playing point guard. They talk trades during the entire game about everybody on the roster and then switch back to talking about shooting characters in their video games&#8230;these are grown men by the way. Not making this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beam</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>Bobbi, go eat some brocoli</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobbi, go eat some brocoli</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Whitsitt</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Whitsitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jimmy Beam..... as 41 would say: Nawt gonna happen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jimmy Beam&#8230;.. as 41 would say: Nawt gonna happen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kilntym</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>kilntym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>One thing that this team has learned is that they don&#039;t give up when they are behind by 10+ points.  You certainly can see that as a plus.  The fact that the team continued to fight despite being behind by 14 points in the 3rd quarter to a very good team was nice to see.  Keep in mind, Detroit was on a 7-game winning streak, and I am sure they came in to PDX fully expecting a win.  Never mind that Roy wasn&#039;t playing, the Pistons believed that they were a better team.  I wonder if they still think that way.

I love this team, just like almost every other person on this blog, but I am not blinded to their faults.  They are young and still learning.  But they definitely have a lot of heart, and that is why I remain a Blazer fan.

As I have said before, this team is poised for a breakthrough.  It may not be this year, where I fully expect a first round exit from the playoffs, but it is coming.  And if they are beating good teams now, just wait until they actually reach that breakthrough point.  It&#039;s an exciting time to be a Blazer fan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that this team has learned is that they don&#8217;t give up when they are behind by 10+ points.  You certainly can see that as a plus.  The fact that the team continued to fight despite being behind by 14 points in the 3rd quarter to a very good team was nice to see.  Keep in mind, Detroit was on a 7-game winning streak, and I am sure they came in to PDX fully expecting a win.  Never mind that Roy wasn&#8217;t playing, the Pistons believed that they were a better team.  I wonder if they still think that way.</p>
<p>I love this team, just like almost every other person on this blog, but I am not blinded to their faults.  They are young and still learning.  But they definitely have a lot of heart, and that is why I remain a Blazer fan.</p>
<p>As I have said before, this team is poised for a breakthrough.  It may not be this year, where I fully expect a first round exit from the playoffs, but it is coming.  And if they are beating good teams now, just wait until they actually reach that breakthrough point.  It&#8217;s an exciting time to be a Blazer fan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Beam</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>Seriously Bob, your predictable, worn out, tired commentary that lacks any insight, is old.  No troll comments, no name calling, no you are a laker fan, etc. 

Bob, don&#039;t go away mad, Bob just go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously Bob, your predictable, worn out, tired commentary that lacks any insight, is old.  No troll comments, no name calling, no you are a laker fan, etc. </p>
<p>Bob, don&#8217;t go away mad, Bob just go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/pragmatism-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1576#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>Bob on behalf of the free world a message for you, yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Were you excited about your Lakers last night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob on behalf of the free world a message for you, yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</p>
<p>Were you excited about your Lakers last night?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
