<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No mystery about THAT game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game</link>
	<description>Just watching the world float by...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Goosey</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Goosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>&quot;So I guess my question is now, do we stand pat and let them gain experience and be a .500 team the rest of the way and finish at about 45 wins or do we make at least a small change? What do you all think?&quot;

Stay with the current crew and help them grow.   The Blazers started three rookies this week.  Roy and Aldridge are still only third year players. 

According to Hollinger, the Blazers have the second toughest strength of schedule so far.   Their opponents have a 54.6% winning percentage.  Only the Wiz have had a tougher schedule.

So the question is whether the current Blazers can play the remaining, relatively weaker, schedule at a better than 50% rate to close the season and make the playoffs.   If they do, then they take the big important next step to their eventual goals.

Small change?  Sure.   You can point to several players who probably won&#039;t have much on-court impact over the next several years, and if you can get something better for them, then go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So I guess my question is now, do we stand pat and let them gain experience and be a .500 team the rest of the way and finish at about 45 wins or do we make at least a small change? What do you all think?&#8221;</p>
<p>Stay with the current crew and help them grow.   The Blazers started three rookies this week.  Roy and Aldridge are still only third year players. </p>
<p>According to Hollinger, the Blazers have the second toughest strength of schedule so far.   Their opponents have a 54.6% winning percentage.  Only the Wiz have had a tougher schedule.</p>
<p>So the question is whether the current Blazers can play the remaining, relatively weaker, schedule at a better than 50% rate to close the season and make the playoffs.   If they do, then they take the big important next step to their eventual goals.</p>
<p>Small change?  Sure.   You can point to several players who probably won&#8217;t have much on-court impact over the next several years, and if you can get something better for them, then go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2826</guid>
		<description>once again I ask the question.  How in the world is channing frye in the NBA????????  Please send him packing to the wnba ASA FREAKNG P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once again I ask the question.  How in the world is channing frye in the NBA????????  Please send him packing to the wnba ASA FREAKNG P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>Good points with the exceptions of Bob and Jack (By the way boys, Przy had 3 REBOUNDS COUNT THEM THREE).

Anyway back to other thoughts.  I really wasn&#039;t going to post because I really had nothing positive to say.  I have taken my meds now and I have a couple of thoughts.

1.  Nic Batum played great.  Not saying he needs more minutes, but he was impressive.

2.  LA bounced back, good effort from him.

3.  Greg and Joel were the victims of inconsistent officiating.  I don&#039;t know how you adjust your game when 3 guys call it three different ways.

4.  Travis....................um, well................he is a nice kid.

5.  Charmin Frye is a sad, sad thing to watch.

I think we can see what we have now.  I think the weaknesses and strengths are very, very obvious.  So I guess my question is now, do we stand pat and let them gain experience and be a .500 team the rest of the way and finish at about 45 wins or do we make at least a small change?  What do you all think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points with the exceptions of Bob and Jack (By the way boys, Przy had 3 REBOUNDS COUNT THEM THREE).</p>
<p>Anyway back to other thoughts.  I really wasn&#8217;t going to post because I really had nothing positive to say.  I have taken my meds now and I have a couple of thoughts.</p>
<p>1.  Nic Batum played great.  Not saying he needs more minutes, but he was impressive.</p>
<p>2.  LA bounced back, good effort from him.</p>
<p>3.  Greg and Joel were the victims of inconsistent officiating.  I don&#8217;t know how you adjust your game when 3 guys call it three different ways.</p>
<p>4.  Travis&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..um, well&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.he is a nice kid.</p>
<p>5.  Charmin Frye is a sad, sad thing to watch.</p>
<p>I think we can see what we have now.  I think the weaknesses and strengths are very, very obvious.  So I guess my question is now, do we stand pat and let them gain experience and be a .500 team the rest of the way and finish at about 45 wins or do we make at least a small change?  What do you all think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Goosey</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Goosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>Dwight, what exactly do you think Martell would have done?   Shoot more outside jumpshots?   That&#039;s his strength, right?  

Think he would make them just because Bayless, Rudy, Sergio, Blake and Outlaw were missing?  Sorry I don&#039;t think Martell is the big help that you&#039;re looking for.

What the Blazers need to replace an injured Roy is somebody who can dribble, penetrate, break down the defense, score and pass.  Bayless  might be able to do that some day.   Rudy might be able to do that sooner.   I don&#039;t recall Martell showing that.

I&#039;ll grant you that Martell would have improved the defense, and defense is always important, but I don&#039;t think that you were talking about defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dwight, what exactly do you think Martell would have done?   Shoot more outside jumpshots?   That&#8217;s his strength, right?  </p>
<p>Think he would make them just because Bayless, Rudy, Sergio, Blake and Outlaw were missing?  Sorry I don&#8217;t think Martell is the big help that you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>What the Blazers need to replace an injured Roy is somebody who can dribble, penetrate, break down the defense, score and pass.  Bayless  might be able to do that some day.   Rudy might be able to do that sooner.   I don&#8217;t recall Martell showing that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll grant you that Martell would have improved the defense, and defense is always important, but I don&#8217;t think that you were talking about defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo bob</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>Greg Oden is sam bowie.

Joel should start.

Greg Oden is hurt

Greg Oden is a bust.

Charmin Frye is a better option.

I am running low on Kool-Aide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Oden is sam bowie.</p>
<p>Joel should start.</p>
<p>Greg Oden is hurt</p>
<p>Greg Oden is a bust.</p>
<p>Charmin Frye is a better option.</p>
<p>I am running low on Kool-Aide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Bog</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Bog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>Four rebounds?

Again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four rebounds?</p>
<p>Again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Whitsitt</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Whitsitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>Maybe the other &quot; Star &quot; should have stepped up a bit more....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the other &#8221; Star &#8221; should have stepped up a bit more&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.dwightjaynes.com/no-mystery-about-that-game/comment-page-1#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dwightjaynes.com/?p=1535#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>What is most glaringly absent are guards who are not afraid to penetrate and score. Outside of Roy we have a team of guards who seem timid when it comes to CONSISTENTLY getting inside and get physical...

What we also need to learn without Roy is controlling the tempo. Teams know we are young and are patient for us to meltdown. I suppose this will change with experience but this is also something that only Roy can do...

Blazer frontline did their job tonight. Nobody on LA can stop Aldridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is most glaringly absent are guards who are not afraid to penetrate and score. Outside of Roy we have a team of guards who seem timid when it comes to CONSISTENTLY getting inside and get physical&#8230;</p>
<p>What we also need to learn without Roy is controlling the tempo. Teams know we are young and are patient for us to meltdown. I suppose this will change with experience but this is also something that only Roy can do&#8230;</p>
<p>Blazer frontline did their job tonight. Nobody on LA can stop Aldridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
