Evaluating NBA coaches isn’t easy
February 23rd, 2010 by Dwight Jaynes | 133 Comments | Filed in Coaches, NBA, Trail BlazersNobody said it was. And whenever I criticize Nate McMillan it always seems to fuel emotions, as it did yesterday.
A couple points I want to make: First, when I find fault with things McMillan does, it doesn’t necessarily mean I’m advocating he be fired. It’s just that it’s only fair to criticize things he does that I disagree with or think he’s wrong about — just as we all criticize players when they do something wrong. It’s part of the job.
But at the same time, there are a lot of people who don’t understand that coaches are always going to be graded on a curve. At a certain point, how many games you win means nothing. It’s how many you should win, given the talent level of your team. It’s how your team plays, given its talent level.
Every time people talk about McMillan, they find an easy defense of him with his win total over the last couple of seasons and the team’s improvement. But folks, the talent level has gone way up, too. He was supposed to win with these players, wasn’t he?
And it’s time to point out that this is big-boy basketball here. The expectations are high and that’s just the way it’s going to be. And it’s the way it’s always been for NBA coaches. That’s life in the big city.
Look, Doug Collins, who was a pretty good coach, jumped his win total in Chicago from 40 in 1986 to 50 in 1987. Then he won 47 in 1988, followed by nine playoff wins that year — and was fired. Del Harris won 61 games as head coach of the Lakers in 1997-98 and was canned 12 games into the following season.
That’s the way it is, folks. As they say, it’s a man’s game.
Tags: Del Harris, Doug Collins, Dwight Jaynes, Nate McMillan, NBA coaches, Portland Trail Blazers



